The Apple Vision Pro, akin to Samsung S24's Ultra version, stands in comparison with Meta Quest 3. While the Vision Pro boasts 4K resolution and possibly additional sensors, the question arises whether these features justify its price, which is six times higher than Meta's headsets. This isn't a critique of Apple's innovation but rather an observation on consumer choices. The hefty price tag of the Apple Vision Pro, without a standout feature that justifies an additional $3000, raises doubts. It's not about disliking Apple; it's about questioning the rationale behind such significant expenditure when more affordable alternatives like Meta's offerings exist. The day Apple Vision Pro reveals a groundbreaking feature worth the extra cost, my view may shift. Until then, it's intriguing to ponder why consumers opt for higher-priced items when functionally comparable, less expensive options are available.
No comments:
Post a Comment